And on the seventh day, the Hoops were Hot.
March 8, 2010 – 11:56 am | One Comment

Western Kentucky and North Texas both flirted with disaster. But in the end, it was only Middle Tennessee that decided to rest on the Sabbath.

Read the full story »
Sports

Everything connected to the wide world of sports. A great metaphor for life, sports allow us to coach you without having to discuss your personal failings specifically.

Entertainment

Movies, music, television and more. Your personal taste probably sucks, and it may be holding you back in life. Trust us to tell you what you should and shouldn’t enjoy.

Lifestyle

Tips and tricks on how to build a life you’ll no longer be ashamed of living. Travelogues, fashion primers, and etiquette guidelines designed to help the modern man and woman navigate today’s world.

Interviews

Candid conversations and insights gained from fascinating people. Whether they’re good or evil, most people are just plain more interesting than you. Use their knowledge to better yourself.

And Everything Else

All our wit and wisdom that doesn’t fit neatly into a distinct little box. Some coaching defies simple categorization. All these essential lessons are collected under one banner.

Home » Featured, Sports

4TtC? - Methodology

Submitted by Ioannis on October 28, 2009 – 8:19 pmNo Comment

4th-times-the-charm

The purpose of this study was to determine:

1) How often does a coach who fails to make it to .500 in any of his first three seasons get retained for a fourth year?

2) When the above situation occurs, how frequently are schools that retain their coach rewarded with later success?

Put simply, how often does a coach keep their job after completing three seasons without ever reaching .500? And of those coaches, how many ever manage to break that threshold for the schools that kept them? If a coach can’t manage one .500 season in three attempts, how likely is it that they’ll be able to break .500 in year four (or five, or six, etc.)?

To answer those questions, I went through the records at the College Football Data Warehouse, starting in the year 1990.

Every time a new coach started at the beginning of a school’s season (i.e.: interim coaches or seasons finished by interim coaches later retained as head coaches weren’t included in any of the lists) in the year 1990 or later, their name, school, and year of hire (their first full season as the school’s head coach) were logged.

If a coach made it through three years without breaking .500 and was retained to coach at least part of a fourth year, that coach’s entry was flagged and their records through all seasons of their tenure with that school were logged.

Those coaches who went on to reach or break .500 for the school that retained them were listed as “successes”. The coaches who never managed to reach .500 were listed as “failures”. Coaches who are currently active that have not yet managed to reach or break .500 at their current school were listed as “undetermined”.

Exceptions/special cases:

1) In 2 or 3 instances, I counted hires made in 1989 who qualified as successes or failures. I  did not list any 1989 hires that broke .500 within 3 years or resigned/were fired before year four.

2) I considered a 6-7 season the equivalent of reaching .500, as the coaches did manage to earn a .500 record in the regular season and a bowl berth. Any coach who managed 6 wins in a season was considered to have a successful season for the purposes of this study.

3) I did not log the tenures of coaches who made a D-1AA to D-1A transition with their teams (Jim Leavitt at USF, Howard Schnellenberger at FAU, etc.).

4) I did not log any coaches who will be starting their first season at a school in the upcoming 2009 season (Brady Hoke at San Diego State, etc.). Since all of these coaches would be “undetermined” and add nothing but noise to the evaluation, I excluded them from the list of hires since 1990.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Remember- if you're not entertaining or informative, you're probably just wasting everyone's time. If this is your first post with a name/email combination, your comment will be held for approval.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.